Muslim Abuse of Genuine Christians:

[iris89]

Muslim Abuse of Genuine Christians:

Members of Islam tell lies about genuine followers of Christ and accuse Christ ministry and gospel of being one of hate - ALL OUTRIGHT LIES. Something should be done about this - pronto:

Read the facts and take action:

ONE LYING POSTER SAID, about my good genuine Christian wife and myself when I went to her defense - YES TERRIBLE:

"No one is lying about you Iris."

When the truth is this very poster has been lying about my good wife:

[1] She called her a sleeper, AN OUTRIGHT LIE.

[2] She called her a very *friendly* person, AN OUTRIGHT LIE.

[3] She called her a twit, AN OUTRIGHT LIE.

[4] She called her an apostate, AN OUTRIGHT LIE.

[5] She said Almighty God (YHWH) = Allah, AN OUTRIGHT LIE. For details see

[0] Iris89 Tells The Factual Truth - Islam Does Not Like: at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=sunni&thread=1182954261

[6] She said the following "Bible knockoff the Qur'an" is an insult, AN OUTRIGHT LIE as it is the truth,
see the proof,

[0] Book Review Shows Quran A Knockoff of The Bible at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=knockoff&thread=1177951059

[[her lie told at, www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=6044 ]

[7] She said "totally away from topic", AN OUTRIGHT LIE, see her comment below,

"This article is about a priest who killed a nun while trying to remove a demon from her.
If it's not your brand of christianity then don't bother about it

It has nothing to do with any holy book or any of the other nonsense you posted that is totally away from the topic" whereas my wife's post was a direct counter to same and dealt with imam's plots for murder showing Islam's religious leaders guilty of same thing as the priest. Now that is not off topic.

[8] She said my wife posted porn, AN OUTRIGHT LIE. First she does not even know the meaning of porn, let's look at what a dictionary and an encyclopedia said,

"PORN, noun: creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire [source - One Look Dictionary, www.onelook.com/?w=porn&ls=a ]"

"Pornography, sometimes shortened to porn or porno, is, in its broadest state, the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal and/or sexual relief. It is similar to erotica, which is the use of sexually-arousing imagery used mainly for artistic purpose. Over the past few decades, an immense industry for the production and consumption of pornography has grown, due to emergence of the VCR, the DVD, and the Internet, as well as the emergence of more tolerant social attitudes.
In general, "erotica" refers to portrayals of sexually arousing material that hold or aspire to artistic or historical merit, whereas "pornography" often connotes the prurient depiction of sexual acts, with little or no artistic value. The line between "erotica" and the term "pornography" (which is frequently considered a pejorative term) is often highly subjective. In practice, pornography can be defined merely as erotica that certain people perceive as "obscene." The definition of what one considers obscene can differ between persons, cultures and eras. This leaves legal actions by those who oppose pornography open to wide interpretation. It also provides lucrative employment for armies of lawyers, on several "sides."
Pornography may use any of a variety of media - printed literature, photos, sculpture, drawing, painting, animation, sound recording, film, video, or video game. However, when sexual acts are performed for a live audience, by definition it is not pornography, as the term applies to the depiction or reproduction of the act, rather than the act itself.[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography ]"

Let's look at what was said, party 1, my good wife, party 2 the liar.
"Party 1 "One women that does not know how to tell the truth and who calls others sleepers, very *friendly* persons, etc. said,"

Party 2 "IF your wife apologized for posting porn then perhaps I would apologize for calling her a sleeper. IF not then only a sleeper would post porn on a religious board so I stand by my opinion.
[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=5935&st=15&start=15 ]"

"by party 2, I am not the one lying, why don't you show us where membership requirement for the porn site is to be muslim if you are truthrul? Your sleeper of a wife (if you're really her husband and not her which I doubt) posted a website which has a naked man at the bottom of the page as well as links to other porn material. Perhaps you good christians don't consider nude images as porn but most conservative, religious people do. "
[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=6011 ]

Now what was posted was from one of their Muslim sites run by Muslim homosexuals who are recognized by BBC, Newsweek, The Middle East Times, etc. not as a porn site but a Muslim homosexual site, contact BBC on GayEgypt org. and they will verify this fact. Can you imagine Muslims charging you with mention of a Muslim site, what an unjust double standard as Muslims are responsible for the site, not any type of Christian. The fact is, my wife is not promoting any pornsight, but simply showing that Muslims are operating a major homosexual site.

"Party 2, even had the nerve to say, 'yOU have failed to deal with why they are doing this since the Qur'an is against homosexuality - you need to explain.'" Now I ask who but Muslims need to explain Muslim actions? This is just ridiculas.

"Party 1, 'you are quick to call attention to some apostate (counterfeit) so called Christian church approving of child sex abuse of which I never questioned the validity as I am a realist, but you have tried to dodge and deny the fact that Muslims are operating a major honosexual site - that is dishonest.'"

[9] She said my wife was rebellious, AN OUTRIGHT LIE. Who better than a women's husband should know the truth?

"Their slanderous post, 'IRIS should be ignored from this point on since she has already admitted that she's just a rebelious ex-muslim who couldn't stomach the laws she was expected to follow.... a poor excuse for turning your back on God if you ask me....[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=5269&st=120&start=120 Page 9]'"

Fact, my wife was never a Muslim as she came from a mixed religious household and never joined either of the false religions of that household, so no way can she be an ex-Muslim when she never was one to begin with.

[10] I, Iris's husband was called a plagiarist, AN OUTRIGHT LIE. Let's first consider what a plagiarist is,

plagiarist = noun: someone who uses another person's words or ideas as if they were his own, [source - One Look Dictionary, www.onelook.com/?w=plagiarist&ls=a ]

Now let's look at the false charge,
"Well at least "he" admits that he's plagarizing "her" work before "he" reposts "her" CP nonsense.
[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=6008]" but I give full credit and use with permission - that is not plagiarizing - so as usual another lie from Islam.

[11] I, Iris's husband was called a deviant, AN OUTRIGHT LIE, as I have not deviated from the teachings of Christ. Now let's look at the definition of deviant,

"ADJECTIVE: Differing from a norm or from the accepted standards of a society. NOUN: One that differs from a norm, especially a person whose behavior and attitudes differ from accepted social standards.
[source- One Look Dictionary]The American HeritageOne Look Dictionary]



While the Apostles were on earth, there was only one classification of for followers of Christ, but shortly after their departure a great many so called Christians fell away from being genuine (true) followers of Christ and this was foretold to pass at Romans 16:17, " But I beseech you, brethren, to consider those who create divisions and occasions of falling, contrary to the doctrine which *ye* have learnt, and turn away from them." (American Standard Version; ASV). If one did not fall away from the genuine teachings of Christ as did many Christians and all members of Islam, they are not deviants with respect the adhering to the genuine teachings of Christ.

[12] Many members of Islam are ignorant of history, and cause and effect. See the proof,

"So You are actually condoning Christian terrorism Like Hiroshima And NAgazaki , The Holocaust ? , The War of roses , first worl war , second world war , All Christian Blood thirsty terrorists carried this out .
[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=6006&st=15&start=15 Page 2]"

Anyone who knows history well knows that Japan and Nazi Germany were the aggressors, or the cause, and that everything else that occurred were the effect and/or results of their cause. Calling this Christian terrorism is nothing but AN OUTRIGHT LIE. For more detail, go to,

[0] Islam Does Not Know Difference Between Cause and Effect or Result: at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=recognize&thread=1163180211&page=1

[13] They claim that "hate as foundation of his (Jesus) faith," AN OUTRIGHT LIE, Jesus was all love as is his Father, Almighty God (YHWH), see Matthew 22:37-40 and 1 John 4:8.

"actual claim, HATE AS FOUNDATION OF HIS (Jesus) FAITH:[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=5917 ]"

[14] They came Islam's Laws are perfect, AN OUTRIGHT LIE. To see the facts,

[1] Islamic Justice - Injustice - In action - Part 1: [74] at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=shia&thread=1182959323 or religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=sunni&thread=1182959708

[2] Islamic Justice - Injustice - In action - Part 2: at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=shia&thread=1182959434 or religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=sunni&thread=1182959582

Here is their original outlandish claim,

"Islam's laws are just because the Creator is Perfect and so His Justice is also Perfect.
[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=6010 ]"

[15] They say, "my wife is defeated" , AN OUTRIGHT LIE, as they have proved none of her facts wrong.

Please go to this web site and post something against the lies they are telling against my good genuine Christian wife. Also, repost this on any web site you have access to.

[16] One of them suggest a desire to choke my wife, i.e., murder her, see,

[0] " suppose you are right brother. I just get so angry at Iris I could choke her
[source - www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=6021&st=75 Page 5]"

husband o***ood Christian lady lied about by members of Islam

[iris89]

Islam Lets Members Run A Homosexual Site Then Wrongly Labels It A Porn Site:

Let's face it what kind of a religion runs a homosexual site and labels it a porn site - ONLY THE MUSLIM RELIGION.

Let's look at the facts:

I never back things that Almighty God (YHWH) disapproves of like gay marriages, the acceptance of gay men, and lesbians such as Bishop Fred Hiltz of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island does. You should well know that these things violate Romans 1:21-27, "because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due." (ASV). Nor do I agree with the Muslims at GayEgypt who actively promote homosexuality. The "The Middle East Times" says "GayEgypt" has emerged as a key source of information and communication for the gay community in Egypt." It's a shame that the Muslim community as well as the apostate (counterfeit) Christian community tolerate such wrong doing.

Now all should see that Muslims are running a homosexual site and calling it a porn site if anyone referrs to it. One should ask what is wrong with the Muslim religion. Of course, the answer is everything. Let's look at the facts, Islam is a completely deviant religion. How so? It has deviated from the genuine teachings of Jesus (Yeshua) Christ, the Son of Almighty God (YHWH) of which the inspired word of Almighty God (YHWH) says at John 14:6, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, and the truth, and the life: no one cometh unto the Father, but by me." (American Standard Version; ASV).

While the Apostles were on earth, there was only one classification of for followers of Christ, but shortly after their departure a great many so called Christians fell away from being genuine (true) followers of Christ and this was foretold to pass at Romans 16:17, " But I beseech you, brethren, to consider those who create divisions and occasions of falling, contrary to the doctrine which *ye* have learnt, and turn away from them." (American Standard Version; ASV). If one did not fall away from the genuine teachings of Christ as did many Christians and all members of Islam, they are not deviants with respect the adhering to the genuine teachings of Christ.

Now Islam has deviated to such an extent that it permits its members to run a major homosexual site in violation of the requirements of Almighty God (YHWH) as given at Romans 1:19-28, " because that which is known of God is manifest in them; for God manifested it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due. 28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting;" (ASV).

Islam is so reprobate of mind and so hypocritical that when anyone refers to their members major homosexual site, which of course is a direct violation of the word of Almighty God (YHWH), they say that he/she is referring to a porn site; however, they avoid the salient fact that it is an Islamic site no matter what you want to call it and it is just plain wrong. But of course that is an issue they want to dodge and not face "head on;" whereas, to a limited degree, even the apostate Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is starting to address the homosexual/pedophile problem it has among its priest.

Instead of being honest and addressing the problem, Islam does its utmost to blunt any discussion about it and to penalize any one with the honesty and integrity to bring it up in any way. They do this in many ways such as claiming anyone bring up this major wrong is referring to a porn site, the burning of a small newspaper office in the Gaza strip some years ago that made the mistake of mentioning it, saying that the major homosexual site is a Christian site [which of course it is not], show it to me in the Qur'an [not accepting reality], but never addressing the fact that no matter what you want to call it, a religion should not be letting it members set up and run such a site. But, of course what can you really expect of a deviant religion which does not even want to recognize the reality that Jesus (Yeshua) is the only begotten Son of God per Matthew 27:43, "He trusted upon God; let him save him now if he will have him. For he said, I am Son of God." (ASV). Of course from such a deviant group which has so many members full of hate, greed, and lust for violence inbreed in them by their religious leaders you can not expect much.

The answer to all trying to suppress reality about this deviant situation is as follows:

"The question should be, "Why does a religion permit its members to run a major homosexual site and promote this evil practice which is condemned by Almighty God (YHWH) and then try to dodge the issue by saying others should not mention it because it is a Porn site. Think a minute, is not running a porn site by members of religion just as evil or worse than a homosexual site, and should not this wrong practice be made known to the world."

Your friend in Christ Iris89

PS, For any who doubt it being either a homosexual site and not a porn site or it being Muslim, you can do as the GayEgypt site says,

"We apologize but due to a change in editorial policy the articles on Islam are currently only available by email. Please write to Ali Asali at [e-mail] requesting copies of our series of essays on Islam and the life of the Prophet Muhammad from a Queer perspective."

[iris89]

Hi Everyone

Many members of Islam make false accusations against Christians, here is my reply to one of them:

What misleading bull crap you post and you do not even have regard for your readers as you have not supplied them with shovels to dig out from under it.

First, You even failed to mention which classification of so called Christians you are speaking of. With respect versions of Christianity, all should look at the two different classifications of same, both groups totally different from the other. The smaller group being the genuine (true) followers of the Christ. For details, go to,

[go to for the facts] Discourse on the Two Paths of So Called Christianity - The Genuine and the Counterfeit at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=monetheist&thread=1163177849&page=1

Second, All should become genuine (true) Christians.

Now what should be done to eliminate all the inbreed hatred inbreed by the religious leaders of the world in pursuit of their false religions and doctrines and their personal agendas? All should become genuine (true) Christians and pursue peace. A good start would be starting to study the Bible using a Bible study in 18 parts on 'follow the Christ' which can be found at,

[found at] religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=jesus&thread=1182482138&page=1

or

examining-doctrines.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=558

Third, With respect being sinners, even the apostate (counterfeit) so called Christians must take second place to Islam.

Let’s look at reality with respect the unconscionable sin committed by members of Islam. As I showed in my last post, members of Islam were behind 9/11 and not G. Bush; he was just a surprised victim of their hatred, greed, and a lust for violence.

A Muslim Sheik, Usama bin Ladin was the mastermind of this great evil that other members of Islam try and distance themselves from with absurd conspiracy theories such as the Jews were behind it even though Sheik Usama bin Ladin admitted he was the mastermind on a tape played on Al Jazzera TV as seen by myself in a replay. Now why do members of Islam want to distance themselves from this great evil? Simple it blows to H*** their claim that Islam is a peaceful religion.

For more details on the true none peaceful nature of Islam, go to,

[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizers_of...1,_2001_attacks

[2] www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...0301confessions

[3] www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm

[4] www.amazon.com/Perfect-Soldiers-Hij...e/dp/0060584696

[5] www.forumofislam.com/index.php?showtopic=5461

or

religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...9585&page=1

[6] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1163175928

[7] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1179020677

[8] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1163810568

[9] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1163810043

[10] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1163810756

[11] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1163810887

[12] religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...80211&page=

Kinda says it all with respect to sinning.

Fourth, Islam permits its members to run major homosexual sites and to publish a homosexual magazine. For details, go to,

[1] Islam Lets Members Run A Homosexual Site Then Wrongly Labels It A Porn Site: [74] at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=disgustingsexualpractices&thread=1183036605

[2] ISLAM IS NOT CLEAN OF HOMOSEXUALITY AS SOME CLAIM, LEARN THE TRUTH: [75]at,

religioustruths.proboards59.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=disgustingsexualpractices&thread=1183569643&page=1 or p197.ezboard.com/ffreedomofspeechfrm5.showMessage?topicID=1239.topic

Your Friend in Christ Iris89

[iris89]

Islam is at it again and my husband wrote the following:

ISLAM DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TRUTH AND FAIRNESS IS:

FIRST, My wife has shown adequately the Qur'an's information was gotten from the Bible with only opinionated conjecture offered to counter as follows:

1. Presented in brief exerts from the works of Christoph Luxenberg a renown scholar of language who writes under a pseudonymic name to protect himself against possible violent repercussions which is testimony to the violent nature of some in Islam. But the quality of his work speaks for itself. An encyclopedia says the following of him,
<<" Christoph Luxenberg is a German scholar and professor of ancient Semitic and Arabic languages [1]. He is the author of The Syro-Aramaic Reading Of The Koran: a contribution to the decoding of the language of the Qur'an (2007)), and several articles in anthologies about early Islam.
Luxenberg came into the public eye in the years after 2000, following the publication of his first book (at least the first one under this pseudonym) The Syro-Aramaic Reading Of The Koran which asserted that the language of the early compositions of the Qu'ran's is not exclusively Arabic, as assumed by the classical commentators, but rather is rooted in the Syrio- Aramic dialect of the 7th century Meccan Quraysh tribe which is associated in the early histories with the founding of the religion of Islam. Luxenberg's premise is that the Aramaic language ­ prevalent throughout the Middle East and during the early period of Islam was the the language of culture and Christian liturgy ­ and had a profound influence on the scriptural composition and meaning of the contents of the Koran. [2][reference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]">>.

In his latest work, he has conclusively proven linguistically speaking that the Qur'an was written using information taken from the Bible without giving due credit to the source. See,

---" Die syro-aramaeische Lesart des Koran; Ein Beitrag zur Entschlüsselung der Qur'ansprache". Berlin, Germany: Das Arabische Buch, First Edition, 2000. Pp. ix + 306, Vol. 6, No. 1, January 2003.---

On this book, Newsweek, said,

<< "Challenging the Quran." The Newsweek article reports on a 2000 book in German, Die syro-aramaeische Lesart des Koran; Ein Beitrag zur Entschlüsselung der Qur'ansprache, by a scholar using the pseudonym Christoph Luxenberg. The details of Luxenberg's intricate and ambitious philological study are too complex to enter into here; for a detailed English-language synopsis, see the review by Robert R. Phenix Jr. and Cornelia B. Horn in Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies.) (For a simplified presentation, see the interview with Luxenberg in Süddeutsche Zeitung.) Suffice to say that Luxenberg's most famous conclusion is that the houris awaiting Muslim martyrs in paradise are not the anticipated wide-eyed virgins but white grapes. Newsweek concludes with the apt prediction that "Luxenberg may be ushering in a whole new era of Qur'anic study."[reference - Newsweek International's July 28, 2003 article]">>.

No objective counter with facts was presented by any in Islam, only opinionated conjecture.

2. Presented scripture in Bible from which Muhammad had his scribes present information regarding birth of Jesus in Qur'an, i.e., Luke 1:35, "And the angel answering, said to her: The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee. And therefore also the Holy which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God." (Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible; DRCB).

In Qur'an, the information taken from the Bible without due credit:

Sura 3:47:
YUSUFALI: She said: "O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?" He said: "Even so: Allah createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it, 'Be,' and it is!
PICKTHAL: She said: My Lord! How can I have a child when no mortal hath touched me? He said: So (it will be). Allah createth what He will. If He decreeth a thing, He saith unto it only: Be! and it is.
SHAKIR: She said: My Lord! when shall there be a son (born) to I me, and man has not touched me? He said: Even so, Allah creates what He pleases; when He has decreed a matter, He only says to it, Be, and it is.]

Sura 3:48:
YUSUFALI: "And Allah will teach him the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel,
PICKTHAL: And He will teach him the Scripture and wisdom, and the Torah and the Gospel,
SHAKIR: And He will teach him the Book and the wisdom and the Tavrat and the Injeel. ]

Only opinionated conjecture offered to refute plus nonsense about Qur'an wording being better than the Bible from which it was taken without due credit being given. Fact 1, Both Bible and Quran wording given is only a version or translation, Fact 2, Information given in Suras clearly show their source in example - the Bible.

3. Evidence given from Qur'an to prove ancient Kingdom of the Hebrews and one of its kings, Solomon, clearly indicate Bible as the reference and show no credit given to source which today is known as plagiarism. For details, read Suras 27:20 to 27:45 and 21:81 to 21:82, and see for yourself information that Muhammad could only have gotten from the Bible, but failed to give credit to the Bible. [note: this information was originally presented to show that the Jews had an ancient kingdom in Palestine and not to show Muhammad got his information from the Bible which it also does.]

4. Same as '3' but on the Queen who visited King Solomon, see Suras 34:12 to 34:14.

Summary, only opinionated conjecture offered to refute my wife's researched data, no facts.

SECOND, My wife has shown adequately that Palestine was given to the descendants of Abraham's son Isaac by Almighty God himself and title was never taken from them with only opinionated conjecture offered to counter as follows:

1. Opinionated conjecture offered against land rightfully belonging to descendants of Abraham's son Isaac,

<<"You see they never belonged there , and God Almighty punished them and scattered them all over the planet cause they disobeyed ." [source - actual quote of one seeking to deny them their own land given to them by Almighty God (YHWH) himself.][taken from wife's article, SHOULD WRONGFUL OCCUPIERS BENEFIT FROM THEIR WRONGFUL OCCUPATION:]">>.

Fact 1, "...they never belonged there" which is clearly just opinionated conjecture as proven by Chapter 34 of Numbers which clearly shows the title to land given to them.

Fact 2, "God Almighty punished them and scattered them all over the planet cause they disobeyed" which is clearly just opinionated conjecture as it fails to deal with the fact that when they turned their lives around Almighty God (YHWH) made the way back as clearly shown in the Bible with respect what transpired when Babylonian captivity ended as clearly recorded in the Book of Nehemiah. Learn the facts, read the Book of Nehemiah and my wife's article ", SHOULD WRONGFUL OCCUPIERS BENEFIT FROM THEIR WRONGFUL OCCUPATION".

Fact 3, Individual giving opinionated conjecture failed to show anything indicating after they were scattered by foreign armies who seized their country, Palestine, that they were not to return.

THIRD, My wife was continually insulted, but the false charge leveled against her was that she was insulting, an untruth.

1. She was lied about and falsely called a very *friendly* person, prostitute, sleeper, twit, etc. which are of course the most gross insults and lies.

2. Called her arrogant for boldly telling the truth.

3. She told the truth and apparently this was taken as an insult, shows the true nature of Islam. Of course they offered no proof of insults by my wife, i.e., redeeming features, as there are none.

4. Even insulted her over a simple typo, can you imagine?

FOURTH, I challenge all to show any error in what I wrote. Give only facts not opinionated conjecture.

Husband-of-Iris

Your Friend in Christ Iris89