Post by iris89 on Nov 17, 2008 14:53:32 GMT -5
Sequel #7 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
INTRODUCTION:
I have written a number of well researched articles on Islam showing it a corrupt and evil religion that cares NOT for the rights of others for basic freedoms such as freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, etc. And what have I been told? I have been told by members of Islam:
“you do not understand Islam [[and you need to go to this or that propaganda site of theirs]].”
“you need to do better research.”
“you need to use a better translation of the Qur’an []
“Islam is a peaceful religion.[[But reality is as expressed by a newspaper quite different, <<<"Did you know that 90-95% of the conflicts in the world today are Muslims fighting non-muslims or each other? " [source - The Weekend Australian, November 26-27, 2005 AD]>>>.
REALITY:
Islam has been the most violent and blood thirsty religion ever known to mankind. Islam has conducted, in greater India in medieval times, genocide of between 80,000,000 and 100,000,000.
Today it continues with the same Standard Operating Procedure; to wit, terror and massacre and then tries to put the blame for these acts on others just as it has always done. A good example of this is the Crusades, let’s look at why Islam was responsible for same:
<<<” Now let's look at the facts of the First Crusade from history and see how the greed and war like ways of Islam brought it on.
<<"In 1009 the Fatimid caliph al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah had sacked the pilgrimage hospice in Jerusalem and destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. It was later rebuilt by the Byzantine emperor, but this event may have been remembered in Europe and may have helped spark the crusade. In 1063, Pope Alexander II had given papal blessing to Iberian Christians in their wars against the Muslims, granting both a papal standard (the vexillum sancti Petri) and an indulgence to those who were killed in battle. Pleas from the Byzantine Emperors, now threatened under by the Seljuks, first in 1074 from Emperor Michael VII to Pope Gregory VII and in 1095 from Emperor Alexius I Comnenus to Pope Urban II, thus fell on ready ears...
This background in the Christian West must be matched with that in the Muslim East. Muslim presence in the Holy Land goes back to the initial Arab conquest of Palestine in the 7th century. This did not interfere much with pilgrimage to Christian holy sites or the security of monasteries and Christian communities in the Holy Land of Christendom, and western Europeans were not much concerned with the loss of far-away Jerusalem when, in the ensuing decades and centuries, they were themselves faced with invasions by Muslims and other hostile non-Christians such as the Vikings and Magyars. However, the Muslim armies' successes were putting strong pressure on the Eastern Orthodox Byzantine Empire.
A turning point in western attitudes towards the east came in the year 1009, when the Fatimid caliph of Cairo, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, had the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem destroyed. His successor permitted the Byzantine Empire to rebuild it under stringent circumstances, and pilgrimage was again permitted, but many stories began to be circulated in the West about the cruelty of Muslims toward Christian pilgrims; these stories then played an important role in the development of the crusades later in the century.
The immediate cause of the First Crusade was Alexius I's appeal to Pope Urban II for mercenaries to help him resist Muslim advances into territory of the Byzantine Empire. In 1071, at the Battle of Manzikert, the Byzantine Empire had been defeated, and this defeat led to the loss of all but the coastlands of Asia Minor (modern Turkey). Although the East-West Schism was brewing between the Catholic Western church and the Greek Orthodox Eastern church, Alexius I expected some help from a fellow Christian. However, the response was much larger, and less helpful, than Alexius I desired, as the Pope called for a large invasion force to not merely defend the Byzantine Empire but also retake Jerusalem.
When the First Crusade was preached in 1095, the Christian princes of northern Iberia had been fighting their way out of the mountains of Galicia and Asturias, the Basque Country and Navarre, with increasing success, for about a hundred years. The fall of Moorish Toledo to the Kingdom of León in 1085 was a major victory, but the turning points of the Reconquista still lay in the future. The disunity of the Muslim emirs was an essential factor, and the Christians, whose wives remained safely behind, were hard to beat: they knew nothing except fighting, they had no gardens or libraries to defend, and they worked their way forward through alien territory populated by infidels, where the Christian fighters felt they could afford to wreak havoc. All these factors were soon to be replayed in the fighting grounds of the East. Spanish historians have traditionally seen the Reconquista as the molding force in the Castilian character, with its sense that the highest good was to die fighting for the Christian cause of one's country.
[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia][source - Religion of Peace That Loves War: by Iris the Preacher]>>>.
Now in modern times, Islam continues to try and shift the blame for their massacres onto others to cover up the evil acts by some of their religious leaders such as Sheik Osama bin Ladin, Sheik Omar Abul Rahman, Sheik Abdullah Assam, Sheikh Tamim Al-Adnani, and many, many, others.
A good example of modern attempts to shift the blame for their massacres is the 9/11 affair where some in Islam attempt to shift the blame for Al Queda’s evil acts at the direction of their beloved Muslim religious leader, Sheik Osama bin Ladin, onto others through conspiracy weaving. Look at my other articles in this series for details.
But the world news continues to ‘trip up’ Islam as it almost daily records and details a new massacre by members of Islam such as,
<<<” Suicide bomber hits Afghan gov't office, killing 6
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan – A suicide bomber driving an oil tanker detonated his explosives outside an Afghan government office during a provincial council meeting Wednesday, killing at least six people and wounding 42, officials said.
The attack in this former Taliban stronghold in southern Afghanistan ripped through the council office, flattened five nearby homes and damaged the offices of the country's intelligence service. The bomb dug a crater some 15 feet into the ground.
Six people died and 42 were wounded in the blast, said Rahmatullah Raufi, the governor of Kandahar province. Among the dead were two intelligence agents, a police officer and three civilians, Raufi said.
He blamed Taliban militants for the attack.
"The Taliban want to disrupt law and order in Kandahar," Raufi said.
The blast came as the provincial council was hearing constituent complaints. Two council members were wounded in the attack, Shafi said.
[source - Suicide bomber hits Afghan gov't office, killing 6, By NOOR KHAN, Associated Press Writer, retrieved on 11/12/2008 at, news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081112/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan]>>>.
Now, this is, as just said, an almost daily occurrence and NOT an isolated anomaly. That is why the Australian newspaper said,
<<<"Did you know that 90-95% of the conflicts in the world today are Muslims fighting non-muslims or each other? " [source - The Weekend Australian, November 26-27, 2005 AD]>>>]].
Now, of course NOT all in Islam commit such massacres, but collectively they have taken the bloodguilt upon themselves by NOT cleaning their organization and making amends for the wrongs through the ages.
Some in Islam say these Sheiks are the extreme exception within Islam, but two facts argue strongly against this. First, they were NEVER excommunicated or punished by others in Islam, and Two, others in Islam supported their evil acts clearly showing that Islam took the bloodguilt upon themselves and is an evil hate group. Now how can I say this? Well, simple, at the time of the destruction of the WTC by cohorts of Muslim religious leader, Sheik Osama bin Ladin, I saw on television and on the internet hundreds of thousands of members of Islam cheering in the streets in many Islamic countries the destruction of the WTC. Clearly, showing many in Islam openly supported this wicked and evil hating action and a lust for violence. So the bloodguilt for same was thus assumed by Islam just as the bloodguilt for the greatest genocide ever known that occurred in India in medieval times.
For details of how Islam has lusted for violence since its inception, go to:
{**} - Blood, Blood, and More Blood, the Story of Islam:
Which on 11/12/2008 could be read at the following locations on the Internet:
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=1180019585
or
www.forumofislam.com/index.php?s=....&showtopic=5461
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=islam&thread=202
or
www.scribd.com/doc/5307641/Blood-Blood-and-More-Blood-the-Story-of-Islam
CONCLUSION:
(1) Islam has taken the blood guilt on themselves for failure to take action against this wicked and evil Muslim religious leader – their failure to act. But should this cause a surprise? Remember, it is not what either the Bible or the Bible knockoff the Qur'an actually say, but how religious leaders be they priest and/or sheiks or imams or muftis or what ever teach the people is the interpretation of what is written either in the Bible or the bible knockoff the Qur'an that matters and governs actions. It matters not what the Bible and/or the Bible knockoff really say. People go by what they are taught by their religious leaders. Take the genocide committed by the Roman Catholic Church at the direction of their supreme religious leader, the pope, what mattered was not that the Bible clearly said at Exodus 20:13, "Thou shalt not kill." (Authorized King James Bible; AV), but what their religious leaders told them. Therefore, it is the religion at fault, irregardless of what their particular holy book, be it the Bible or the Bible knockoff the Qur'an may say. Neither is so called Christianity or in Islam are most individuals actions really governed in any way by what their particular holy book really says, but they are governed by the interpretation of their religious leaders. Thus, knowing this reality, one would be either just plain stupid and/or dumb to even bother looking at a particular religion's holy book and expect the members would conform to it. Take the Rig Vede and find me for example a Hindu actually conforming to it instead of the interpretation given to it by his religious leaders, like looking for a needle in the haystack per K.S. Lal, India's greatest historian.
In fact, the Qur’an clearly says at Sura 5:13 That one should be kind to others. Let’s look at this Sura from three different versions of the Quran:
Sura 5:13 AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE, THE TABLE SPREAD). Which we shall show from three different versions/translations, requires members of Islam to be kind with others. Now let's look at how it stated in three different versions of the Qur'an.
YUSUFALI: But because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard; they change the words from their (right) places and forget a good part of the message that was sent them, nor wilt thou cease to find them- barring a few - ever bent on (new) deceits: but forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds): for Allah loveth those who are kind.
PICKTHAL: And because of their breaking their covenant, We have cursed them and made hard their hearts. They change words from their context and forget a part of that whereof they were admonished. Thou wilt not cease to discover treachery from all save a few of them. But bear with them and pardon them. Lo! Allah loveth the kindly.
SHAKIR: But on account of their breaking their covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard; they altered the words from their places and they neglected a portion of what they were reminded of; and you shall always discover treachery in them excepting a few of them; so pardon them and turn away; surely Allah loves those who do good (to others).
So obviously this evil and wicked Muslim religious leader, Osama bin Ladin was in violation of this Sura.
Of course the same situation exist among so called Christians, but NOT among genuine true followers of Jesus (Yeshua) Christ. In fact, there is a book that asks and answers the question with respect what the Bible really says, “What Does the Bible Really Teach,” by Watch Tower Bible and Track Society of Pennsylvania.
(2) Read the entire Sequel to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality at the following: [[All links valid on 11/12/2008]]
[/li][li] Sequel to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....play&thread=795
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=islam&thread=294
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7646743/Sequel....uth-and-Reality
[/li][li] Sequel #2 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=796&page=1
Or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=295&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7712961/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #3 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=798&page=1
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=297&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7775976/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #4 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=799&page=1
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=298&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7789207/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #5 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=801&page=1
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=300&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7818297/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #6 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....ence&thread=803
OR
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=islam&thread=301
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7865040/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
Your Friend in Christ Iris89
INTRODUCTION:
I have written a number of well researched articles on Islam showing it a corrupt and evil religion that cares NOT for the rights of others for basic freedoms such as freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, etc. And what have I been told? I have been told by members of Islam:
“you do not understand Islam [[and you need to go to this or that propaganda site of theirs]].”
“you need to do better research.”
“you need to use a better translation of the Qur’an []
“Islam is a peaceful religion.[[But reality is as expressed by a newspaper quite different, <<<"Did you know that 90-95% of the conflicts in the world today are Muslims fighting non-muslims or each other? " [source - The Weekend Australian, November 26-27, 2005 AD]>>>.
REALITY:
Islam has been the most violent and blood thirsty religion ever known to mankind. Islam has conducted, in greater India in medieval times, genocide of between 80,000,000 and 100,000,000.
Today it continues with the same Standard Operating Procedure; to wit, terror and massacre and then tries to put the blame for these acts on others just as it has always done. A good example of this is the Crusades, let’s look at why Islam was responsible for same:
<<<” Now let's look at the facts of the First Crusade from history and see how the greed and war like ways of Islam brought it on.
<<"In 1009 the Fatimid caliph al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah had sacked the pilgrimage hospice in Jerusalem and destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. It was later rebuilt by the Byzantine emperor, but this event may have been remembered in Europe and may have helped spark the crusade. In 1063, Pope Alexander II had given papal blessing to Iberian Christians in their wars against the Muslims, granting both a papal standard (the vexillum sancti Petri) and an indulgence to those who were killed in battle. Pleas from the Byzantine Emperors, now threatened under by the Seljuks, first in 1074 from Emperor Michael VII to Pope Gregory VII and in 1095 from Emperor Alexius I Comnenus to Pope Urban II, thus fell on ready ears...
This background in the Christian West must be matched with that in the Muslim East. Muslim presence in the Holy Land goes back to the initial Arab conquest of Palestine in the 7th century. This did not interfere much with pilgrimage to Christian holy sites or the security of monasteries and Christian communities in the Holy Land of Christendom, and western Europeans were not much concerned with the loss of far-away Jerusalem when, in the ensuing decades and centuries, they were themselves faced with invasions by Muslims and other hostile non-Christians such as the Vikings and Magyars. However, the Muslim armies' successes were putting strong pressure on the Eastern Orthodox Byzantine Empire.
A turning point in western attitudes towards the east came in the year 1009, when the Fatimid caliph of Cairo, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, had the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem destroyed. His successor permitted the Byzantine Empire to rebuild it under stringent circumstances, and pilgrimage was again permitted, but many stories began to be circulated in the West about the cruelty of Muslims toward Christian pilgrims; these stories then played an important role in the development of the crusades later in the century.
The immediate cause of the First Crusade was Alexius I's appeal to Pope Urban II for mercenaries to help him resist Muslim advances into territory of the Byzantine Empire. In 1071, at the Battle of Manzikert, the Byzantine Empire had been defeated, and this defeat led to the loss of all but the coastlands of Asia Minor (modern Turkey). Although the East-West Schism was brewing between the Catholic Western church and the Greek Orthodox Eastern church, Alexius I expected some help from a fellow Christian. However, the response was much larger, and less helpful, than Alexius I desired, as the Pope called for a large invasion force to not merely defend the Byzantine Empire but also retake Jerusalem.
When the First Crusade was preached in 1095, the Christian princes of northern Iberia had been fighting their way out of the mountains of Galicia and Asturias, the Basque Country and Navarre, with increasing success, for about a hundred years. The fall of Moorish Toledo to the Kingdom of León in 1085 was a major victory, but the turning points of the Reconquista still lay in the future. The disunity of the Muslim emirs was an essential factor, and the Christians, whose wives remained safely behind, were hard to beat: they knew nothing except fighting, they had no gardens or libraries to defend, and they worked their way forward through alien territory populated by infidels, where the Christian fighters felt they could afford to wreak havoc. All these factors were soon to be replayed in the fighting grounds of the East. Spanish historians have traditionally seen the Reconquista as the molding force in the Castilian character, with its sense that the highest good was to die fighting for the Christian cause of one's country.
[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia][source - Religion of Peace That Loves War: by Iris the Preacher]>>>.
Now in modern times, Islam continues to try and shift the blame for their massacres onto others to cover up the evil acts by some of their religious leaders such as Sheik Osama bin Ladin, Sheik Omar Abul Rahman, Sheik Abdullah Assam, Sheikh Tamim Al-Adnani, and many, many, others.
A good example of modern attempts to shift the blame for their massacres is the 9/11 affair where some in Islam attempt to shift the blame for Al Queda’s evil acts at the direction of their beloved Muslim religious leader, Sheik Osama bin Ladin, onto others through conspiracy weaving. Look at my other articles in this series for details.
But the world news continues to ‘trip up’ Islam as it almost daily records and details a new massacre by members of Islam such as,
<<<” Suicide bomber hits Afghan gov't office, killing 6
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan – A suicide bomber driving an oil tanker detonated his explosives outside an Afghan government office during a provincial council meeting Wednesday, killing at least six people and wounding 42, officials said.
The attack in this former Taliban stronghold in southern Afghanistan ripped through the council office, flattened five nearby homes and damaged the offices of the country's intelligence service. The bomb dug a crater some 15 feet into the ground.
Six people died and 42 were wounded in the blast, said Rahmatullah Raufi, the governor of Kandahar province. Among the dead were two intelligence agents, a police officer and three civilians, Raufi said.
He blamed Taliban militants for the attack.
"The Taliban want to disrupt law and order in Kandahar," Raufi said.
The blast came as the provincial council was hearing constituent complaints. Two council members were wounded in the attack, Shafi said.
[source - Suicide bomber hits Afghan gov't office, killing 6, By NOOR KHAN, Associated Press Writer, retrieved on 11/12/2008 at, news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081112/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan]>>>.
Now, this is, as just said, an almost daily occurrence and NOT an isolated anomaly. That is why the Australian newspaper said,
<<<"Did you know that 90-95% of the conflicts in the world today are Muslims fighting non-muslims or each other? " [source - The Weekend Australian, November 26-27, 2005 AD]>>>]].
Now, of course NOT all in Islam commit such massacres, but collectively they have taken the bloodguilt upon themselves by NOT cleaning their organization and making amends for the wrongs through the ages.
Some in Islam say these Sheiks are the extreme exception within Islam, but two facts argue strongly against this. First, they were NEVER excommunicated or punished by others in Islam, and Two, others in Islam supported their evil acts clearly showing that Islam took the bloodguilt upon themselves and is an evil hate group. Now how can I say this? Well, simple, at the time of the destruction of the WTC by cohorts of Muslim religious leader, Sheik Osama bin Ladin, I saw on television and on the internet hundreds of thousands of members of Islam cheering in the streets in many Islamic countries the destruction of the WTC. Clearly, showing many in Islam openly supported this wicked and evil hating action and a lust for violence. So the bloodguilt for same was thus assumed by Islam just as the bloodguilt for the greatest genocide ever known that occurred in India in medieval times.
For details of how Islam has lusted for violence since its inception, go to:
{**} - Blood, Blood, and More Blood, the Story of Islam:
Which on 11/12/2008 could be read at the following locations on the Internet:
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=1180019585
or
www.forumofislam.com/index.php?s=....&showtopic=5461
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=islam&thread=202
or
www.scribd.com/doc/5307641/Blood-Blood-and-More-Blood-the-Story-of-Islam
CONCLUSION:
(1) Islam has taken the blood guilt on themselves for failure to take action against this wicked and evil Muslim religious leader – their failure to act. But should this cause a surprise? Remember, it is not what either the Bible or the Bible knockoff the Qur'an actually say, but how religious leaders be they priest and/or sheiks or imams or muftis or what ever teach the people is the interpretation of what is written either in the Bible or the bible knockoff the Qur'an that matters and governs actions. It matters not what the Bible and/or the Bible knockoff really say. People go by what they are taught by their religious leaders. Take the genocide committed by the Roman Catholic Church at the direction of their supreme religious leader, the pope, what mattered was not that the Bible clearly said at Exodus 20:13, "Thou shalt not kill." (Authorized King James Bible; AV), but what their religious leaders told them. Therefore, it is the religion at fault, irregardless of what their particular holy book, be it the Bible or the Bible knockoff the Qur'an may say. Neither is so called Christianity or in Islam are most individuals actions really governed in any way by what their particular holy book really says, but they are governed by the interpretation of their religious leaders. Thus, knowing this reality, one would be either just plain stupid and/or dumb to even bother looking at a particular religion's holy book and expect the members would conform to it. Take the Rig Vede and find me for example a Hindu actually conforming to it instead of the interpretation given to it by his religious leaders, like looking for a needle in the haystack per K.S. Lal, India's greatest historian.
In fact, the Qur’an clearly says at Sura 5:13 That one should be kind to others. Let’s look at this Sura from three different versions of the Quran:
Sura 5:13 AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE, THE TABLE SPREAD). Which we shall show from three different versions/translations, requires members of Islam to be kind with others. Now let's look at how it stated in three different versions of the Qur'an.
YUSUFALI: But because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard; they change the words from their (right) places and forget a good part of the message that was sent them, nor wilt thou cease to find them- barring a few - ever bent on (new) deceits: but forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds): for Allah loveth those who are kind.
PICKTHAL: And because of their breaking their covenant, We have cursed them and made hard their hearts. They change words from their context and forget a part of that whereof they were admonished. Thou wilt not cease to discover treachery from all save a few of them. But bear with them and pardon them. Lo! Allah loveth the kindly.
SHAKIR: But on account of their breaking their covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard; they altered the words from their places and they neglected a portion of what they were reminded of; and you shall always discover treachery in them excepting a few of them; so pardon them and turn away; surely Allah loves those who do good (to others).
So obviously this evil and wicked Muslim religious leader, Osama bin Ladin was in violation of this Sura.
Of course the same situation exist among so called Christians, but NOT among genuine true followers of Jesus (Yeshua) Christ. In fact, there is a book that asks and answers the question with respect what the Bible really says, “What Does the Bible Really Teach,” by Watch Tower Bible and Track Society of Pennsylvania.
(2) Read the entire Sequel to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality at the following: [[All links valid on 11/12/2008]]
[/li][li] Sequel to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....play&thread=795
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=islam&thread=294
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7646743/Sequel....uth-and-Reality
[/li][li] Sequel #2 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=796&page=1
Or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=295&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7712961/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #3 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=798&page=1
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=297&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7775976/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #4 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=799&page=1
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=298&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7789207/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #5 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....read=801&page=1
or
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?a....read=300&page=1
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7818297/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
[/li][li] Sequel #6 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and Reality
religioustruths.proboards59.com/i....ence&thread=803
OR
jude3.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=islam&thread=301
or
www.scribd.com/doc/7865040/Sequel....th-and-Reality-
Your Friend in Christ Iris89